IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Fabiano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-04-23 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Tufts
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 31 7 9 16 0.516 0.1022 0.1022 0.2351 0.2351
2024-25 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 32 1 6 7 0.219 0.0433 0.0433 0.0997 0.0997
2025-26 Northeast Generals NAHL 55 6 11 17 0.309 0.1136 0.1128 0.3263 0.3241
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15541
Defenseman overall
#2752
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Tufts Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cal LeClair
0.28
actual FR PPG at Tufts
J.J. Ganss
0.00
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Trevor John
0.80
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Clay Berger
0.46
actual FR PPG at Tufts

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Michalchuk
Manhattanville · 2006-07
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Malcarney
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Doner
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.