IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Malcarney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-04-26 Country: Switzerland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Skipjacks Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 43 10 25 35 0.814 0.0918 0.0901 0.2769 0.2717
2018-19 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 40 4 20 24 0.600 0.0677 0.0628 0.2041 0.1894
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 22 1 3 4 0.182
2021-22 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 20 0 3 3 0.150
2020-21 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lebanon Valley D1 — FR 16 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 16 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5252
Defenseman overall
#1162
Defenseman born in 1998
#1744
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Willett
Hamilton · 2013-14
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Henry
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Salas
SUNY Potsdam · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.