IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Salas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NA3HL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NA3HL 4 1 3 4 1.000 0.1106 0.1136 0.3168 0.3255
2022-23 New York Apple Core EHL 46 6 16 22 0.478 0.0700 0.0709 0.2345 0.2375
2023-24 — EHL 34 4 12 16 0.471 0.0688 0.0662 0.2307 0.2220
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 25 1 7 8 0.320
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 23 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18505
Defenseman overall
#3238
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Hopfer
Canton · 2015-16
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Meeh
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2015-16
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Armand Uomoleale
New England · 2014-15
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.