← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Willett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 North York Rangers OJHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0698 0.0770 0.1725 0.1904
2010-11 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 28 2 10 12 0.429 0.1198 0.1267 0.2958 0.3127
2011-12 OJHL 44 10 34 44 1.000 0.2794 0.2831 0.6901 0.6991
2012-13 Toronto Patriots OJHL 19 5 12 17 0.895 0.2500 0.2408 0.6174 0.5947
2013-14 Toronto Patriots OJHL 27 5 8 13 0.481 0.1345 0.1227 0.3323 0.3031
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 24 9 10 19 0.792
2016-17 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 23 12 9 21 0.913
2015-16 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 24 8 12 20 0.833
2014-15 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 23 5 4 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2014-15 · Hamilton
+168.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19668
Forward overall
#750
Forward born in 1993
#1449
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2012-13
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia Wisconsin · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.