| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | North York Rangers | OJHL | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.0698 | 0.0770 | 0.1725 | 0.1904 |
| 2010-11 | Vaughan Vipers | OJHL | 28 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.429 | 0.1198 | 0.1267 | 0.2958 | 0.3127 |
| 2011-12 | — | OJHL | 44 | 10 | 34 | 44 | 1.000 | 0.2794 | 0.2831 | 0.6901 | 0.6991 |
| 2012-13 | Toronto Patriots | OJHL | 19 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 0.895 | 0.2500 | 0.2408 | 0.6174 | 0.5947 |
| 2013-14 | Toronto Patriots | OJHL | 27 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.481 | 0.1345 | 0.1227 | 0.3323 | 0.3031 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Hamilton | D3 | NESCAC | SR | 24 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 0.792 |
| 2016-17 | Hamilton | D3 | NESCAC | JR | 23 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 0.913 |
| 2015-16 | Hamilton | D3 | NESCAC | SO | 24 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 0.833 |
| 2014-15 | Hamilton | D3 | NESCAC | FR | 23 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.391 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.