← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Kolowrat Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-14 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 4 12 16 0.390 0.1095 0.1158 0.3208 0.3392
2017-18 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 47 11 13 24 0.511 0.2082 0.2069 0.4104 0.4079
2018-19 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 43 9 22 31 0.721 0.2939 0.2753 0.5795 0.5428
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 19 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 25 5 6 11 0.440
2020-21 Suffolk D1 CNE SO 2 3 0 3 1.500
2020-21 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 2 3 0 3 1.500
2019-20 Suffolk D1 CNE FR 24 5 5 10 0.417
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 24 5 5 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2019-20 · Suffolk
+96.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13990
Forward overall
#635
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2023-24
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2024-25
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.