← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Kolowrat Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-14 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 4 12 16 0.390 0.1172 0.1239 0.3214 0.3398
2017-18 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 47 11 13 24 0.511 0.1439 0.1430 0.4134 0.4108
2018-19 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 43 9 22 31 0.721 0.2031 0.1902 0.5836 0.5467
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 19 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 25 5 6 11 0.440
2020-21 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 2 3 0 3 1.500
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 24 5 5 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2019-20 · Suffolk
+184.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25219
Forward overall
#1036
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Northland · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.