IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cal LeClair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 34 14 24 38 1.118 0.2582 0.2556 0.5468 0.5414
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 7 1 2 3 0.429
2020-21 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Tufts D1 NESCAC SO 18 4 2 6 0.333
2019-20 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 18 4 2 6 0.333
2018-19 Tufts D1 NESCAC FR 18 3 2 5 0.278
2018-19 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 18 3 2 5 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2018-19 · Tufts
+27.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9750
Forward overall
#427
Forward born in 1998
#91
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pearce Vance
Westfield State · 2014-15
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryden McGhee
Williams · 2008-09
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vinny Post
Adrian · 2014-15
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.