← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Cronin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 31 19 35 54 1.742 0.3451 0.3451 0.7936 0.7936
2019-20 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 44 2 6 8 0.182 0.1072 0.1072 0.5460 0.5460
2020-21 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 48 28 25 53 1.104 0.6514 0.6514 3.3164 3.3164
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 35 17 11 28 0.800
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 33 4 12 16 0.485
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 31 1 4 5 0.161
2021-22 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 30 7 5 12 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2021-22 · New Hampshire
+35.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
80%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6997
Forward overall
#300
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2021-22
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2003-04
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.