← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Schweighardt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 35 2 4 6 0.171 0.1054 0.1054 0.5050 0.5050
2020-21 Omaha Lancers USHL 49 3 12 15 0.306 0.1882 0.1882 0.9018 0.9018
2021-22 USHL 50 4 12 16 0.320 0.1967 0.1762 0.9428 0.8444
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 35 4 13 17 0.486
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 36 0 10 10 0.278
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 33 1 3 4 0.121
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 18 1 1 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2022-23 · UMass Lowell
-33.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8543
Defenseman overall
#1739
Defenseman born in 2001
#3053
in USHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2018-19
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.