IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Magnuss Bars Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-09-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1981 0.2108 0.5250 0.5587
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Fralich
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Smith
Norwich · 2006-07
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Leonard
Western New England · 2000-01
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.