IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Tserlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-25 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0306 0.0331 0.0879 0.0950
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#61137
Forward overall
#1484
Forward born in 2008
#6881
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Cotton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Félix Caron
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brady McIsaac
BCHL 2022-23
0.24
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Shane LaVelle
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Drew Kuzma
SJHL 2020-21
0.23
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Patrick Schmiedlin
USHL 2019-20
0.21
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Coffey
Hobart · 2015-16
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Cifelli
Castleton · 2006-07
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ray Hou
Amherst · 2021-22
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.