IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Rohrer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-26 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0983 0.1019 0.5007 0.5193
2023-24 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 39 12 20 32 0.821 0.3015 0.3114 0.8660 0.8945
2024-25 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 55 20 38 58 1.054 0.3874 0.3798 1.1130 1.0912
2025-26 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 51 18 44 62 1.216 0.4466 0.4159 3.0034 2.6673
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7877
Forward overall
#295
Forward born in 2005
#605
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Olivier Houde
QMJHL 2024-25
0.93
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Patrick Schmiedlin
NAHL 2022-23
0.21
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Ryan Finnegan
NCDC 2017-18
0.69
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Cade DeStefani
NAHL 2021-22
0.58
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Christopher Miraldo
Westfield State · 2022-23
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Dill
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.