IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Dziver Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-15 Country: Canada
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Coquitlam Express BCHL 18 5 3 8 0.444 0.1712 0.1761 0.6467 0.6651
2024-25 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 48 20 29 49 1.021 0.3750 0.3733 1.0775 1.0725
2025-26 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 48 30 45 75 1.562 0.5741 0.5432 1.6492 1.5604
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7119
Forward overall
#246
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cade DeStefani
NAHL 2021-22
0.58
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Louis-Philippe Fontaine
QMJHL 2024-25
0.70
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Jacob Fletcher
BCHL 2024-25
0.89
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Olivier Houde
QMJHL 2023-24
0.93
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alessio Luciani
Adrian · 2018-19
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.