IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Coffey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-01-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Pickering Panthers OJHL 46 5 20 25 0.543 0.1332 0.1462 0.3742 0.4107
2015-16 — OJHL 25 5 5 10 0.400 0.0980 0.1021 0.2754 0.2870
2016-17 Brockville Braves CCHL 27 5 8 13 0.481 0.1044 0.1049 0.3725 0.3742
2017-18 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 56 7 15 22 0.393 0.1444 0.1404 0.4147 0.4033
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 28 7 15 22 0.786
2020-21 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hobart D1 SUNYAC SO 26 2 12 14 0.538
2019-20 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 26 2 12 14 0.538
2018-19 Hobart D1 SUNYAC FR 25 3 3 6 0.240
2018-19 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 25 3 3 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2018-19 · Hobart
+101.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14017
Defenseman overall
#2240
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dave Gervais
Neumann · 2008-09
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick O'Neal
Norwich · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Christensen
Saint Anselm · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.