IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dave Gervais Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-01-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Nepean Raiders CCHL 48 12 9 21 0.438 0.1397 0.1464 0.3387 0.3550
2007-08 Nepean Raiders CCHL 59 20 20 40 0.678 0.2165 0.2165 0.5248 0.5248
2008-09 Nepean Raiders CCHL 44 4 26 30 0.682 0.2177 0.2050 0.5278 0.4969
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC SR 26 6 12 18 0.692
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC JR 22 8 8 16 0.727
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC SO 21 5 5 10 0.476
2009-10 Neumann D3 — FR 22 6 7 13 0.591
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2009-10 · Neumann
+229.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28253
Forward overall
#920
Forward born in 1989
#752
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Rintel
Worcester State · 2005-06
1.048 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Zannella
Buffalo State · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.