IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabriel Simpson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-01-13 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 51 3 15 18 0.353 0.1439 0.1556 0.2837 0.3068
2025-26 — BCHL 39 3 5 8 0.205 0.0790 0.0809 0.2985 0.3058
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12565
Defenseman overall
#1662
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Anderson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Jonathan Wong
BCHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Joe Prouty
NAHL 2020-21
0.37
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Noah Houle
CCHL 2022-23
0.50
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Scarpino
Hobart · 2006-07
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Allen
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Murphy
Westfield State · 2008-09
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.