← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kim Elfving Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-19 Country: Sweden
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Södertälje SK U20 SHL-J20 19 0 1 1 0.053 0.0292 0.0308 0.0701 0.0740
2023-24 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 46 3 25 28 0.609 0.2402 0.2418 0.8267 0.8323
2024-25 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 43 8 15 23 0.535 0.2111 0.2019 0.7264 0.6947
2025-26 Södertälje SK U20 SHL-J20 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0927 0.0850 0.2221 0.2036
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3012
Defenseman overall
#772
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
USHL 2024-25
0.29
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
AJHL 2020-21
0.40
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
NAHL 2020-21
0.33
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Colby · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2017-18
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.