IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Jensen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Skipjacks Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 44 19 36 55 1.250 0.1683 0.1671 0.4255 0.4224
2018-19 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 43 17 22 39 0.907 0.1221 0.1147 0.3087 0.2901
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 22 3 4 7 0.318
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 9 1 6 7 0.778
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 27 2 4 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2019-20 · Lawrence
+91.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29255
Forward overall
#1239
Forward born in 1998
#775
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Oliver Arnberg
Nichols · 2016-17
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hoy
Adrian · 2012-13
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Lumsden
Fredonia · 2001-02
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.