IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oliver Arnberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-19 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 46 19 25 44 0.957 0.2053 0.1982 0.4684 0.4522
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Nichols D3 CNE SR 4 1 1 2 0.500
2019-20 Nichols D3 CNE JR 24 0 3 3 0.125
2018-19 Nichols D3 CNE SO 8 1 0 1 0.125
2017-18 Nichols D3 CNE FR 23 6 1 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2017-18 · Nichols
+79.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19512
Forward overall
#805
Forward born in 1996
#178
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bobby Hineman
Adrian · 2006-07
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy McGlynn
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Lavery
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.