← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jan Lasak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-11 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 25 3 0 3 0.120 0.0738 0.0738 0.3535 0.3535
2020-21 Jokerit U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.2707 0.2707 0.7426 0.7426
2021-22 Janesville Jets NAHL 51 27 28 55 1.078 0.4273 0.4302 1.1322 1.1399
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 16 4 2 6 0.375
2023-24 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 35 6 7 13 0.371
2022-23 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 34 4 11 15 0.441
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2022-23 · St. Lawrence
+19.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15590
Forward overall
#816
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2017-18
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.