← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tomas Mazura Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-23 Country: Czechia
2019 · Round 6, Pick #162  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kimball Union NE-Prep 36 8 26 34 0.944 0.1871 0.1871 0.4303 0.4303
2019-20 Omaha Lancers USHL 4 1 2 3 0.750 0.4424 0.4424 2.2526 2.2526
2020-21 HIFK U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 3 1 2 3 1.000 0.5420 0.5420 1.5123 1.5123
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC 17 1 13 14 0.824
2023-24 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC 34 6 14 20 0.588
2022-23 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC 28 3 9 12 0.429
2021-22 Providence D1 HockeyEast 8 1 1 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2021-22 · Providence
+56.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19022
Forward overall
#861
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.