IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Archambeault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New England Stars NA3HL 43 16 29 45 1.046 0.1261 0.1378 0.3306 0.3612
2017-18 New England Stars NA3HL 45 20 28 48 1.067 0.1285 0.1339 0.3370 0.3511
2018-19 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 35 9 21 30 0.857 0.1839 0.1867 0.4197 0.4260
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 30 10 14 24 0.800 0.1717 0.1717 0.3918 0.3918
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 26 3 10 13 0.500
2022-23 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 25 7 6 13 0.520
2021-22 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 24 4 4 8 0.333
2020-21 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
30%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25025
Forward overall
#1032
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Nichol
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Egan
Babson · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Keagan O'Donoghue
Salem State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.