IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Archambeault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New England Stars NA3HL 43 16 29 45 1.046 0.1313 0.1434 0.3304 0.3610
2017-18 New England Stars NA3HL 45 20 28 48 1.067 0.1339 0.1395 0.3368 0.3509
2018-19 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 35 9 21 30 0.857 0.1980 0.2010 0.4194 0.4257
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 30 10 14 24 0.800 0.1848 0.1848 0.3914 0.3914
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 26 3 10 13 0.500
2022-23 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 25 7 6 13 0.520
2021-22 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 24 4 4 8 0.333
2020-21 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
25%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18277
Forward overall
#886
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Nichol
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Egan
Babson · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Keagan O'Donoghue
Salem State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.