IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keagan O'Donoghue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 41 17 27 44 1.073 0.1404 0.1396 0.3642 0.3622
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 19 2 0 2 0.105 0.0429 0.0429 0.0846 0.0846
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC GR 25 12 18 30 1.200
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 25 11 10 21 0.840
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 24 11 20 31 1.292
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 25 9 14 23 0.920
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14380
Forward overall
#672
Forward born in 1999
#800
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Panchisin
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris McGrath
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Nesper
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2006-07
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.