IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keagan O'Donoghue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 41 17 27 44 1.073 0.1445 0.1437 0.3653 0.3633
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 19 2 0 2 0.105 0.0297 0.0297 0.0853 0.0853
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC GR 25 12 18 30 1.200
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 25 11 10 21 0.840
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 24 11 20 31 1.292
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 25 9 14 23 0.920
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31130
Forward overall
#1378
Forward born in 1999
#943
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Panchisin
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Hodd-Chlebeck
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Drysdale
Canton · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.