IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastian Miedema Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-09-09 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Brynäs IF U20 SuperElit 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Brynäs IF U20 SuperElit 36 1 4 5 0.139 0.0548 0.0555 0.1886 0.1911
2019-20 Brynäs IF U20 SuperElit 21 1 9 10 0.476 0.1879 0.1879 0.6467 0.6467
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Nichols D3 CNE — 23 2 5 7 0.304
2022-23 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA — 9 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8732
Defenseman overall
#1672
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ayden Peters
Adrian · 2022-23
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Thieda
Norwich · 2008-09
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stephen Ginand
UMass Dartmouth · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.