IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Rudrud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0769 0.0769 0.3916 0.3916
2020-21 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 37 4 9 13 0.351 0.1291 0.1291 0.3709 0.3709
2021-22 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 60 30 20 50 0.833 0.3062 0.2933 0.8795 0.8424
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA SR 19 1 1 2 0.105
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA — 32 6 3 9 0.281
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA — 29 5 7 12 0.414
2022-23 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26051
Forward overall
#1328
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Bates
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Gilmour
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Valadao
Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.