IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Rudrud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0802 0.0802 0.3842 0.3842
2020-21 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 37 4 9 13 0.351 0.1392 0.1392 0.3689 0.3689
2021-22 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 60 30 20 50 0.833 0.3302 0.3163 0.8749 0.8380
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA SR 19 1 1 2 0.105
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA — 32 6 3 9 0.281
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA — 29 5 7 12 0.414
2022-23 Alaska Fairbanks D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26294
Forward overall
#1339
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Valadao
Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Bates
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Mooney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.