IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Gow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1982-10-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — BCHL 55 7 24 31 0.564 0.2172 0.2257 0.8202 0.8523
2002-03 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 47 7 29 36 0.766 0.2951 0.2776 1.1148 1.0487
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 27 0 7 7 0.259
2005-06 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 28 2 5 7 0.250
2004-05 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 21 0 6 6 0.286
2003-04 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 29 2 8 10 0.345
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2003-04 · St. Norbert
+42.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4420
Defenseman overall
#621
Defenseman born in 1982
#1026
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Wendt
Adrian · 2017-18
1.034 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Acorn
Elmira · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Klugerman
Concordia · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.