IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Keenan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-03-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — BCHL 52 4 16 20 0.385 0.1433 0.1444 0.5604 0.5647
2001-02 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 57 13 21 34 0.597 0.2222 0.2116 0.8692 0.8279
2002-03 — BCHL 42 11 15 26 0.619 0.2306 0.2097 0.9019 0.8201
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#26950
Forward overall
#712
Forward born in 1982
#1636
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Bullard
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Bennett
Elmira · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.