← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Baumgartner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Minot Minotauros NAHL 27 4 14 18 0.667 0.2449 0.2449
2020-21 NAHL 35 8 12 20 0.571 0.2099 0.2099 0.6031 0.6031
2021-22 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 56 11 31 42 0.750 0.2756 0.2759 0.7916 0.7925
2022-23 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 44 10 31 41 0.932 0.3423 0.3259 0.9835 0.9363
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA JR 31 5 16 21 0.677
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA 21 2 9 11 0.524
2023-24 Air Force D1 AHA 24 4 6 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2023-24 · Air Force
+44.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2881
Defenseman overall
#732
Defenseman born in 2002
#643
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.