← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Kennedy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 10 1 2 3 0.300 0.1066 0.1066
2021-22 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 29 1 1 2 0.069 0.0407 0.0402 0.2033 0.2009
2022-23 NAHL 52 3 22 25 0.481 0.1708 0.1674 0.5048 0.4947
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 20 2 13 15 0.750
2024-25 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 24 4 6 10 0.417
2023-24 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 25 7 14 21 0.840
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2023-24 · Connecticut College
+742.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41005
Forward overall
#2597
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2013-14
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2005-06
1.048 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.