| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Cowichan Valley Capitals | BCHL | 36 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.222 | 0.0856 | 0.0947 | 0.3238 | 0.3582 |
| 2002-03 | Merritt Centennials | BCHL | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1.500 | 0.5779 | 0.6144 | 2.1856 | 2.3236 |
| 2003-04 | Alberni Valley Bulldogs | BCHL | 57 | 2 | 15 | 17 | 0.298 | 0.1149 | 0.1170 | 0.4345 | 0.4426 |
| 2004-05 | — | BCHL | 53 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 0.283 | 0.1090 | 0.1059 | 0.4124 | 0.4009 |
| 2005-06 | Fort McMurray Oil Barons | AJHL | 21 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.238 | 0.0799 | 0.0733 | 0.2207 | 0.2026 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | New England College | D3 | — | FR | 20 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.250 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.