← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Meagher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-11-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1284 0.1458 0.4843 0.5500
2003-04 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 40 0 3 3 0.075 0.0252 0.0263 0.0692 0.0721
2004-05 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 29 1 3 4 0.138 0.0463 0.0460 0.1272 0.1265
2005-06 AJHL 58 9 21 30 0.517 0.1735 0.1643 0.4771 0.4518
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 27 1 3 4 0.148
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 19 3 2 5 0.263
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 26 0 4 4 0.154
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 26 0 3 3 0.115
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2006-07 · St. Scholastica
+4.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17351
Defenseman overall
#1465
Defenseman born in 1985

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2015-16
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.