IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sutter Muzzatti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-28 Country: USA
2023 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #143  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 — NAHL 30 5 8 13 0.433 0.1717 0.1717 3.7219 3.7219
2021-22 — NAHL 50 12 34 46 0.920 0.3645 0.3830 0.9659 1.0149
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 37 13 19 32 0.865
2024-25 RPI D1 ECAC — 10 2 1 3 0.300
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC — 33 10 15 25 0.758
2022-23 RPI D1 ECAC — 35 7 15 22 0.629
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2022-23 · RPI
+91.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17137
Forward overall
#855
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.35 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Wiesner
Babson · 2015-16
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Pier-Olivier Cotnoir
Norwich · 2007-08
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.