IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Griffin Ludtke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lakeville South USHS-MN 30 9 16 25 0.833 0.1027 0.1027 — —
2020-21 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 44 1 11 12 0.273 0.1609 0.1609 0.8034 0.8034
2021-22 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 50 4 11 15 0.300 0.1770 0.1752 0.8839 0.8749
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 36 0 17 17 0.472
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 36 2 11 13 0.361
2023-24 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 40 4 23 27 0.675
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 14 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7385
Defenseman overall
#1747
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike McPherson
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.