← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyler Kleven Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Minot Minotauros NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0508 0.0540 0.1500 0.1595
2019-20 Minot Minotauros NAHL 48 25 28 53 1.104 0.3922 0.3922
2020-21 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 53 13 12 25 0.472 0.2783 0.2783 1.3897 1.3897
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC 7 1 4 5 0.714
2024-25 Niagara D1 AHA 26 3 6 9 0.346
2023-24 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 25 1 2 3 0.120
2022-23 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 27 2 0 2 0.074
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2021-22 · Minnesota Duluth
+60.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11611
Forward overall
#476
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby · 2004-05
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.