| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.143 | 0.0508 | 0.0540 | 0.1500 | 0.1595 |
| 2019-20 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 48 | 25 | 28 | 53 | 1.104 | 0.3922 | 0.3922 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 53 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 0.472 | 0.2783 | 0.2783 | 1.3897 | 1.3897 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | — | 7 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.714 |
| 2024-25 | Niagara | D1 | AHA | — | 26 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.346 |
| 2023-24 | Minnesota Duluth | D1 | NCHC | — | 25 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.120 |
| 2022-23 | Minnesota Duluth | D1 | NCHC | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2021-22 | Minnesota Duluth | D1 | NCHC | — | 27 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.074 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.