IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Wescoe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 42 22 21 43 1.024 0.4174 0.4174 0.8229 0.8229
2021-22 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 49 25 47 72 1.469 0.5991 0.5657 1.1811 1.1153
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA — 24 4 16 20 0.833
2024-25 Niagara D1 AHA — 26 1 2 3 0.115
2023-24 Niagara D1 AHA — 19 4 1 5 0.263
2022-23 Niagara D1 AHA — 10 0 1 1 0.100
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA — 24 4 16 20 0.833
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA — 24 4 16 20 0.833

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2410
Forward overall
#92
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Scorcia
Salve Regina · 2010-11
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Laganiere
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Paul
Bethel · 2008-09
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.