← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shawn O'Donnell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Madison Capitols USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.0816 0.0816 0.2345 0.2345
2021-22 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 58 4 14 18 0.310 0.1830 0.1846 0.9320 0.9404
2022-23 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 49 4 6 10 0.204 0.1204 0.1152 0.6130 0.5866
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC 34 3 3 6 0.176
2024-25 Clarkson D1 ECAC 39 1 3 4 0.103
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 10 0 1 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2023-24 · UMass Lowell
-18.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36399
Forward overall
#2252
Forward born in 2003
#3295
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2005-06
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2006-07
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.