← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Gagnon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-03-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 57 5 10 15 0.263 0.1014 0.1076 0.3835 0.4068
2003-04 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 60 16 23 39 0.650 0.2504 0.2544 0.9471 0.9624
2004-05 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 59 18 36 54 0.915 0.3527 0.3419 1.3337 1.2930
2005-06 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 54 20 10 30 0.556 0.2141 0.1968 0.8096 0.7444
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 SR 22 5 13 18 0.818
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 JR 24 4 5 9 0.375
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 SO 25 3 3 6 0.240
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 FR 11 0 1 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2006-07 · St. Scholastica
-58.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20200
Forward overall
#634
Forward born in 1985
#988
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2022-23
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.