IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles-Alexis Legault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-09-05 Country: Canada
2023 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #139  ·  Carolina Hurricanes Carolina Hurricanes
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 — USHL 23 3 2 5 0.217 0.1336 0.1336 0.6405 0.6405
2021-22 — BCHL 36 6 12 18 0.500 0.1862 0.1934 0.7286 0.7567
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 39 9 15 24 0.615
2022-23 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 40 2 7 9 0.225
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2022-23 · Quinnipiac
+23.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trever Hertz
Utica · 2007-08
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Sharkey
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Corran
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2000-01
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.