IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Wanchulak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-05-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 55 2 11 13 0.236 0.0793 0.0806 0.2181 0.2218
2002-03 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 38 0 9 9 0.237 0.0794 0.0785 0.2184 0.2160
2003-04 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 58 8 14 22 0.379 0.1272 0.1167 0.3499 0.3210
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 28 2 7 9 0.321
2006-07 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 28 2 10 12 0.429
2005-06 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 18 2 4 6 0.333
2004-05 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2004-05 · Manhattanville
+248.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18577
Defenseman overall
#1305
Defenseman born in 1983
#2051
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lance Malark
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Coykendall
Adrian · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Singerhouse
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.