← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryan Huggins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Austin Bruins NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 NAHL 12 1 4 5 0.417 0.1480 0.1480
2020-21 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 48 2 6 8 0.167 0.0592 0.0592 0.1750 0.1750
2021-22 Fargo Force USHL 52 1 10 11 0.211 0.1248 0.1182 0.6231 0.5901
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SR 29 1 6 7 0.241
2024-25 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 32 1 4 5 0.156
2023-24 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SO 30 0 4 4 0.133
2022-23 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA FR 34 0 2 2 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2022-23 · Lake Superior State
-47.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14417
Defenseman overall
#2700
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2017-18
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.