IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ted Vickers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-04-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 57 8 7 15 0.263 0.0980 0.0998 0.3835 0.3907
2004-05 Powell River Kings BCHL 46 10 20 30 0.652 0.2429 0.2361 0.9503 0.9237
2005-06 — BCHL 50 15 11 26 0.520 0.1937 0.1786 0.7577 0.6985
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Amherst D3 — SR 22 4 7 11 0.500
2008-09 Amherst D3 — JR 27 11 11 22 0.815
2007-08 Amherst D3 — SO 13 1 1 2 0.154
2006-07 Amherst D3 — FR 24 2 10 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2006-07 · Amherst
+189.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30135
Forward overall
#918
Forward born in 1985
#1871
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Carvalho
SUNY Morrisville · 2012-13
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Alexander
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.