IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Lundy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 29 6 1 7 0.241 0.0899 0.0899 — —
2020-21 — NAHL 41 9 14 23 0.561 0.2223 0.2223 0.5890 0.5890
2021-22 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 60 32 25 57 0.950 0.3764 0.3547 0.9974 0.9398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA SR 27 5 6 11 0.407
2024-25 American International D1 AHA GR 37 10 10 20 0.540
2023-24 American International D1 AHA SR 26 14 8 22 0.846
2022-23 American International D1 AHA JR 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2022-23 · American International
-63.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19658
Forward overall
#915
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Ecklund
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Enmark
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Doull
Lake Forest · 2002-03
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.