← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Calafiore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 49 17 16 33 0.673 0.2668 0.2668 0.7071 0.7071
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 52 26 33 59 1.135 0.4495 0.4447 1.1912 1.1786
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 54 20 28 48 0.889 0.3522 0.3312 0.9333 0.8776
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast 21 1 0 1 0.048
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast 19 2 2 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2023-24 · Maine
-34.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10792
Forward overall
#521
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.