IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dan Genovese Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 52 5 10 15 0.288 0.1112 0.1072 0.4199 0.4050
2005-06 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 56 14 29 43 0.768 0.2959 0.2706 1.1175 1.0218
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 16 1 1 2 0.125
2008-09 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 20 0 4 4 0.200
2007-08 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 7 0 2 2 0.286
2006-07 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 27 0 6 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2006-07 · Manhattanville
+14.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6166
Defenseman overall
#840
Defenseman born in 1985
#1419
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fernand-Olivier Perron
University of New England · 2024-25
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Meers
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.