IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Milan Cermak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-27 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tri-City Storm USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0306 0.0306 0.0879 0.0879
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1019 0.1029 0.2009 0.2028
2022-23 — NCDC 37 7 10 17 0.460 0.1873 0.1813 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Chatham D3 UCHC — 23 3 2 5 0.217
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC — 22 4 1 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2023-24 · Chatham
+77.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39069
Forward overall
#2415
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cooper Brown
Concordia · 2023-24
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bill Walsh
Worcester State · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Mood
Chatham · 2018-19
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.