IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Mood Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-10-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2146 0.2300 0.4897 0.5249
2018-19 WB/Scranton Knights EHL 39 16 17 33 0.846 0.1816 0.1855 0.4144 0.4234
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 25 2 3 5 0.200
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 24 4 5 9 0.375
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 13 1 1 2 0.154
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 25 5 1 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2019-20 · Chatham
+37.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22681
Forward overall
#917
Forward born in 1999
#267
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Fritz
Saint John's · 2013-14
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zilka
Hamline · 2005-06
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Westmark
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.