IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Winnett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-04-03 Country: Canada
2007 · Round 4, Pick #104  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 60 18 31 49 0.817 0.3147 0.3527 1.1885 1.3320
2006-07 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 39 27 30 57 1.462 0.5631 0.6009 2.1269 2.2697
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Michigan D1 CCHA-orig SR 40 5 7 12 0.300
2009-10 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 44 6 8 14 0.318
2008-09 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 32 4 7 11 0.344
2007-08 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 41 6 5 11 0.268
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2007-08 · Michigan
-42.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7432
Forward overall
#276
Forward born in 1989
#116
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Trevor Moore
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Denver (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sean Malone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.87 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Strong
NCAAe PPG
J.T. Compher
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.96 PPG
→ Michigan (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.69 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Gabe Guertler
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Anthony Louis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Miami (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Goudreau
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.