IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner House Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-04-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Canmore Eagles AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2003-04 Canmore Eagles AJHL 58 13 19 32 0.552 0.1831 0.1950 0.5113 0.5446
2004-05 Canmore Eagles AJHL 58 11 18 29 0.500 0.1659 0.1688 0.4634 0.4715
2005-06 Penticton Vees BCHL 52 14 17 31 0.596 0.2221 0.2163 0.8687 0.8461
2006-07 Penticton Vees BCHL 58 14 55 69 1.190 0.4432 0.4079 1.7335 1.5955
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 35 10 25 35 1.000
2009-10 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 35 18 21 39 1.114
2008-09 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 39 10 14 24 0.615
2007-08 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 29 1 10 11 0.379
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2007-08 · Maine
+33.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16928
Forward overall
#574
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Dalton
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Boyd Stahlbaum
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.