← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole O'Hara Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-20 Country: Canada
2022 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #114  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 OJHL 53 11 31 42 0.792 0.2381 0.2667 0.5425 0.6076
2019-20 OJHL 51 21 43 64 1.255 0.3770 0.3770 0.8590 0.8590
2020-21 USHL 49 11 17 28 0.571 0.3512 0.3512 1.6835 1.6835
2021-22 USHL 58 25 48 73 1.259 0.7737 0.7419 3.7081 3.5556
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UMass D1 HockeyEast 40 22 29 51 1.275
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 40 22 29 51 1.275
2023-24 UMass D1 HockeyEast 37 7 11 18 0.486
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 37 7 11 18 0.486
2022-23 UMass D1 HockeyEast 32 4 13 17 0.531
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 32 4 13 17 0.531
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2022-23 · UMass
+3.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

95%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.61 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.84 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.