IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark McKamey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-05-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Powell River Kings BCHL 18 0 2 2 0.111 0.0428 0.0461 0.1614 0.1738
2006-07 Powell River Kings BCHL 60 3 2 5 0.083 0.0321 0.0329 0.1210 0.1238
2007-08 Powell River Kings BCHL 58 4 12 16 0.276 0.1063 0.1031 0.4009 0.3887
2008-09 Powell River Kings BCHL 56 4 6 10 0.179 0.0688 0.0638 0.2595 0.2407
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 26 1 7 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2009-10 · Wentworth
+351.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#53418
Forward overall
#1793
Forward born in 1988
#3030
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Wall
Trine · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Meier
Augsburg · 2012-13
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Elliott
Hamilton · 2000-01
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.