IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Elliott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1980-05-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Portage Terriers MJHL 44 14 13 27 0.614 0.1668 0.1540 0.3867 0.3569
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SR 40 12 12 24 0.600
2010-11 Mercyhurst D1 AHA JR 37 4 7 11 0.297
2009-10 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SO 38 7 14 21 0.553
2008-09 Mercyhurst D1 AHA FR 22 2 6 8 0.364
2004-05 Hamilton D3 — SO 17 0 4 4 0.235
2003-04 Hamilton D3 — FR 23 6 3 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2003-04 · Hamilton
+196.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33738
Forward overall
#548
Forward born in 1980
#751
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Jackson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dominic Brenza
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Novick
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.